Who leaked the Chappell email

In September 2005, on a tour of Zimbabwe, the India coach Greg Chappell sent a confidential report to the BCCI. In it he wrote that his captain, Sourav Ganguly, was struggling as a player, that his state of mind was fragile, and that it was time for him to move on.

Within days the text was in every newspaper in India, attributed to unnamed sources.

The first link in the chain is not actually a mystery. Cricinfo, publishing the full text on 25 September, noted where it had come from: shown first by India TV, then printed by DNA in Mumbai. That is the far end of the leak, the point at which a private document became a public one. What has never been established is the step before it.

What it did

It ended a captaincy. Ganguly was dropped from the side entirely within months. There were street protests in Kolkata, effigies burned, and a split in Indian cricket's support base that lasted for years and in some quarters has never closed.

It also set the terms for the entire Chappell era, which ended in a first-round exit at the 2007 World Cup, and for the reconstruction that followed it. A single leaked document reshaped a decade.

Who has said what

Virender Sehwag has said he was sitting beside Chappell as the email was typed, read it over his shoulder, and went to warn Ganguly.

Harbhajan Singh has said he saw it on an open laptop.

Both of those are accounts of how players came to know what the email said. Neither is an account of how a journalist came to have the text of it. Those are different questions, and only the first has ever been answered.

Three questions, not one

The story collapses three separate questions into one, and only two of them have answers.

Who wrote the email is known and has never been contested. Chappell wrote it and has not denied writing it. How players in the squad learned what it said is partly known, from Sehwag and Harbhajan, and their accounts are compatible with each other.

How the text reached a newsroom is the third question. It is the only one that determines whether this was an indiscretion, an accident or an operation, and it is the one nobody has answered.

There is no scorecard for this

It is one of the few entries in this series where the decisive event happened entirely off the field. No ball was bowled. No innings turned on it.

What exists is an email, a set of newspaper reports, and a chain of custody that nobody has described. There is no document trail because the document is the thing that leaked, and the route it took is the part that was never written down.

Why nobody has ever said

Leak stories usually resolve in the end. Someone retires, writes a book, settles a score, or simply grows old enough to stop caring.

This one has not, and the likeliest reason is that the leak served several people at once. A coach wanting his position strengthened, an administrator wanting a captain removed, a faction within the dressing room, a journalist with a career-making story. Each has a reason to stay quiet, and quiet is cheap.

What the shorthand gets wrong

It is usually said that the email ended Ganguly’s career. It did not. He was dropped, recalled at the end of 2006, and played Test cricket until 2008, including a return to Australia.

What it ended was the captaincy, and a working relationship, and any possibility that the two men could be discussed separately again. Twenty years on, neither name appears in an Indian cricket history without the other.

What is left

Everyone involved has now retired. Chappell has written about the period. Ganguly went on to run the board that employed them both. Sehwag and Harbhajan have told their versions repeatedly on television.

Nobody has ever admitted to putting the email in front of a journalist, and the gap has now outlasted the careers of every person who was in the room.

The full text of Greg Chappell's e-mail to the BCCI, ESPNcricinfo, 25 September 2005 →

••••••

No. 10 in Mysteries, a series of 11.

NextWhy Lala Amarnath was really sent home