Two hundred and fifteen in a hundred and sixty-five minutes

Basil Butcher had taken five wickets in his Test career when he was thrown the ball at Queen’s Park Oval in March 1968. He was a middle-order batsman. He bowled leg spin the way most middle-order batsmen do, which is to say when the captain has run out of ideas.

Garry Sobers had run out of ideas because three Tests of the series had been drawn and all three had been dull.

West Indies had Sobers, Rohan Kanhai, Seymour Nurse, Clive Lloyd, Lance Gibbs and Charlie Griffith. England had Colin Cowdrey, whose main tactical instinct was not to lose. On paper it was a mismatch. On the field it had produced nothing at all, and Caribbean crowds had begun to say so at volume.

Where the match stood

West Indies made 526 for seven and declared. Kanhai 153. Nurse 136. Steve Camacho 87. It was the sort of total that settles a match by removing any way of losing it.

England replied with 404, Cowdrey batting the better part of two days for 148. What ended the innings was not Griffith and it was not Gibbs. It was Basil Butcher, a middle-order batsman who bowled leg spin when nobody else could take a wicket, and who had five wickets to his name in his entire Test career.

Butcher took 5 for 34.

West Indies batted again on the fourth evening and closed on 92 for two. On the final afternoon Sobers declared and left England 215.

They had a hundred and sixty-five minutes to get them.

Full scorecard: West Indies v England, 4th Test, Queen’s Park Oval, 14–19 March 1968 →

The chase

Geoff Boycott and John Edrich put on 55. Boycott’s reputation was for occupying a crease rather than clearing a boundary; he was the man English crowds barracked for scoring too slowly. He made 80 not out at better than a run a minute.

Cowdrey came in and batted like someone who had decided something on the way to the wicket. Seventy-one from 75 balls. Ten fours. He and Boycott added 118 in seventy-six minutes, which in 1968 was a rate nobody associated with either of them.

Sobers bowled himself for fourteen overs and took none for 48.

They got there in 52.4 overs, which is a shade over four an over. In 1968, three an over was considered brisk and a side chasing anything was generally expected to shut up shop by the second hour. England did not shut up shop. Cowdrey, who had spent four Tests giving every impression of a man whose ambition was a drawn series, took the target on from the moment he arrived.

England reached 215 for three with three minutes to spare.

The case for the declaration

Three draws had made the series tedious and the crowds hostile. A declaration was the only route to a result, and Sobers wanted a result badly enough to buy one. He had watched England bat for a month. Nothing in that month suggested they could score at seventy-eight an hour for the best part of three hours.

That is the defence, and it is a serious one. It was made at the time by people who had sat through the same month of cricket he had.

What it does not explain is the margin. Sobers did not set a target England might just reach with everything going right. He set one they reached with seven wickets and three minutes in hand.

What it cost

The fifth Test was drawn. England took the series 1–0 on the strength of that afternoon, and it is still the only series they won in the Caribbean between 1935 and 1990.

Sobers was burned in effigy in Trinidad. He kept the captaincy. He did not keep the benefit of the doubt, and the declaration followed him for the rest of his playing life and well past the end of it, produced as evidence whenever a captain thought about giving an opponent a chance.

What the card cannot settle

Every figure on it supports the decision. The result contradicts it.

A captain with the stronger side, in a series going nowhere, gave the weaker side one chance to win inside a hundred and sixty-five minutes. They took it, by three wickets and three minutes, having been given both.

Nothing in the record distinguishes a bad decision from a sound one that lost. Sobers has defended it consistently for close to sixty years and has never sounded like a man being asked an easy question. The scorecard says 92 for two declared. Eleven lines below, it says 215 for three. It offers no way at all of telling those two things apart.

••••••

No. 1 in Declared, a series of 1.

TomorrowThree hundred and thirty-four, and no more