1996
Eden Gardens, 13 March 1996
A World Cup semi-final abandoned in flames, an allegation made fifteen years later, and no inquiry then or since.
Sri Lanka were one for two in the first over of the World Cup semi-final at Eden Gardens. Romesh Kaluwitharana went first ball. Sanath Jayasuriya went two balls later. Javagal Srinath bowled both of them, and a hundred thousand people made a noise that people who were there still describe thirty years on.
It was one for two when Aravinda de Silva came in.
He made 66 from 47 balls. Fourteen of them went for four.
Roshan Mahanama made 58 and retired hurt at 182 for five with a leg injury. He did not come back. Sri Lanka finished on 251 for eight, Srinath took three for 34, and Sachin Tendulkar bowled his full ten overs and took two.
India needed 252 in front of a hundred thousand people. Sachin Tendulkar and Navjot Sidhu opened.
Ninety-eight for one
Sidhu went early for 3. Tendulkar and Sanjay Manjrekar then took the score to 98 without further loss, and with more than half the overs still to come India were, by any ordinary reading, winning.
Tendulkar was stumped off Sanath Jayasuriya for 65.
Mohammad Azharuddin was caught and bowled by Kumar Dharmasena for 0 at 99. Manjrekar was bowled by Jayasuriya at 101. Javagal Srinath was run out at 110. Ajay Jadeja was bowled by Jayasuriya at 115. Nayan Mongia was caught at 120. Aashish Kapoor was caught at 120.
Ninety-eight for one had become 120 for eight in twelve overs, and Jayasuriya’s figures read 7–1–12–3.
Seven wickets had gone down for 22 runs. The man who stumped Tendulkar to start it was Kaluwitharana, who had been out for nought to the first ball he faced.
Full scorecard: India v Sri Lanka, 1st Semi-Final, Eden Gardens, 13 March 1996 →
The fires
Sections of the crowd set fire to the stands and threw bottles onto the outfield. Play was stopped. When the players tried to resume, bottles came again at the fielders on the boundary.
Clive Lloyd, the match referee, awarded the match to Sri Lanka. Vinod Kambli walked off in tears with 10 not out against his name, and that image outlived everything else about the night.
What the toss says
Three of the four accounts of that night that anybody can point to were given years afterwards by men with something at stake in how they were believed, and the fourth is a scorecard that records what happened without ever addressing why any of it was chosen.
The card records: India, elected to field first.
This was the fourth day-night match in five at Eden Gardens won by the side batting first. The pitch was expected to deteriorate. Batting second under lights in Calcutta in March was, at the time, understood to be the harder job.
What Kambli said, fifteen years later
He said on television that he doubted the game. Specifically, that India had agreed among themselves to bat first, and that Azharuddin then chose to field.
The scorecard confirms the second half of that: India did field first. It confirms nothing about the first half, which is the part that would matter.
Azharuddin, by then serving a life ban for match-fixing, dismissed the claim flatly. Ajit Wadekar, the team manager, said they had simply misread the pitch. Team-mates denied it.
Who made the call
The referee was Clive Lloyd. He had captained West Indies to two World Cups and lost a third final, and had spent a career in front of crowds like that one.
He gave the match to Sri Lanka. India needed 132 from 95 balls with two wickets standing, so what he awarded was a game that was already over.
Sri Lanka went to Lahore and won the final. It was their first World Cup semi-final and they have never played a better tournament.
The result stands in the records as won by default. There are only a handful of those in the history of international cricket, and this is the only one in a World Cup knockout.
The inquiry that never happened
A World Cup semi-final was abandoned in front of a burning stand. An allegation was later made on national television by a man who had been at the crease. No cricket authority has ever formally examined either event.
The absence of an inquiry is not evidence of anything. It is just an absence, thirty years old, and permanent.
••••••
No. 3 in Mysteries, a series of 11.
NextGavaskar’s 36
If you got something out of this, there is a tip jar.
Buy me a coffee →